Create accountLogin

Recent searches

No recent searches

Search options

Not available on tukkers.online.
tukkers.online is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Kömt derin, dan küj deroet kiek'n. Dit is een sociaal netwerk voor tukkers! Zonder advertenties, zonder algoritme voor je tijdlijn en zonder dat je data verkocht wordt :)

Administered by:

Server stats:

9
active users

tukkers.online: AboutProfiles directoryPrivacy policy

Mastodon: AboutGet the appKeyboard shortcutsView source codev4.3.6

#CrossRef

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Public *
Nicolas Fressengeas

Autorisez le lien ORCID/Crossref, ORCID/DataCite et ORCID/HAL pour ajouter vos travaux sur votre profil ORCID : fiche pratique par @virginilang

doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1498016

#pids
#hal
#ORCID
#CrossRef
#datacite
#UnivLorraine

ZenodoAutorisez le lien ORCID/Crossref, ORCID/DataCite et ORCID/HAL pour ajouter vos travaux sur votre profil ORCIDCette fiche pratique à destination des personnels de recherche détenteurs d'un profil ORCID, a pour objectif d'expliquer comment autoriser le lien entre son ORCID et Crossref, DataCite et HAL. Ces liens permettent : d'ajouter ses travaux de manière automatisée (articles, chapitres, rapports, jeux de données,... ayant un DOI Crossref ou DataCite associés à son identifiant ORCID)  d'ajouter ses travaux de manière manuelle (articles, ouvrages, communications, posters, vidéos, logiciels, rapports, thèses, PGD,... présents dans HAL). Mise en forme graphique : Damien Babonnaud (Université de Lorraine, Direction de la Documentation).
Replied in thread
Public *
Nemo_bis 🌈

@egonw Ah that's smart, retroactively issuing DOIs for URLs which got cited in order to use #CrossRef citation infra.

I'd be curious to see how many outlinks of paywalled publications the #InternetArchive has managed to archive. Can one extract links from the full text with #ISTEX (social.numerique.gouv.fr/@Inis)? Maybe @chipotte knows.

social.numerique.gouv.frCNRS Inist (@InistCNRS@social.numerique.gouv.fr)Attaché : 1 image Rejoignez l'Inist et le @cnrs par le biais d'un concours interne affecté et venez travailler, en tant que documentaliste, sur #Istex (ouvert aux CDD, CDI et fonctionnaires avec au moins 4 ans de services publics) détails : https://profilsdemplois.cnrs.fr/profil/index_public_referens?destination=CIAF2025
#digipres
Public
Crossref

The Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI) are evolving. A public consultation is now open on proposed updates to ensure the principles continue to meet the needs of the community.

If you work with or support open infrastructure, read our latest blog post to learn more and share your perspective: tinyurl.com/2fm6bx4j

www.crossref.orgPOSI 2.0 feedback - CrossrefAs a provider of foundational open scholarly infrastructure, Crossref is an adopter of the Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI). In December 2024 we posted our updated POSI self-assessment. POSI provides an invaluable framework for transparency, accountability, susatinability and community alignment. There are 21 other POSI adopters. Together, we are now undertaking a public consultation on proposed revisions for a version 2.0 release of the principles, which would update the current version 1.
#crossref#scholarlycommunity#scholcomms
Public
Crossref

We've got news! Retraction Watch data is now integrated with Crossref's existing #metadata, allowing #researchers to access retraction information directly through the Crossref REST API. More info in our latest blog post: tinyurl.com/3mdju992

www.crossref.orgRetraction Watch retractions now in the Crossref API - CrossrefRetractions and corrections from Retraction Watch are now available in Crossref’s REST API. Back in September 2023, we announced the acquisition of the Retraction Watch database with an ongoing shared service. Since then, they have sent us regular updates, which are publicly available as a csv file. Our aim has always been to better integrate these retractions with our existing metadata, and today we’ve met that goal. This is the first time we have supplemented our metadata with a third-party data source.
#crossref#scholcomms#scholarlypublishing
Replied in thread
Public
jonny (good kind)

@dhobern i'm shocked that's not a better known story. #crossref is staffed by cool people that I like now, but literally nobody i have talked to has been aware of the origin story that is extremely clearly spelled out in the one historical document i can find on the origin of the DOI system (i'm sure there are others, i just haven't been able to find them). I think this document is startlingly revealing because it was commissioned in 2009 before being loud and proud about "fuck everything about the commercial publishers" was a common thing, and it was before the shift in business models made people give a critical eye to the infrastructural underpinnings of their power.

they literally say "we cooked up the #DOI in a smoky back room for the sole purpose of killing Harold Varmus' plan to make universal free to publish, free to read open access that looks a hell of a lot like eLife's publish, review, curate model in 1999." it's text not subtext

crossref.org/pdfs/CrossRef10Ye

Public *
Skeptical Science

"Is global warming real?" It's a legitimate question when asked by innocent people confused by calculated misinformation.

Hint: So far this year we've covered 1,080 academic papers on climate science, climate change, and dealing with the many-faceted climate mess we've created. By #CrossRef count, some 9,456 researchers helped to extend our understanding by contributing to this effort. In seven weeks.

This edition is another #OpenAccess cornucopia.

#ClimateResearch
skepticalscience.com/new_resea

Screen capture of first section of weekly "Skeptical Science New Research" feature, for week 7 of 2024. The first section teases with excerpts from papers that are open access and free to read and which may have broad appeal.
Public
petersuber

#Crossref (@crossref) has "developed a new, heuristic-based strategy for matching #journal #articles to their #preprints. It achieved the following results on the evaluation dataset: precision 0.99, recall 0.95, F0.5 0.98."
crossref.org/blog/discovering-

It's sharing the code on Github.
gitlab.com/crossref/labs/marpl

www.crossref.orgDiscovering relationships between preprints and journal articles - CrossrefIn the scholarly communications environment, the evolution of a journal article can be traced by the relationships it has with its preprints. Those preprint–journal article relationships are an important component of the research nexus. Some of those relationships are provided by Crossref members (including publishers, universities, research groups, funders, etc.) when they deposit metadata with Crossref, but we know that a significant number of them are missing. To fill this gap, we developed a new automated strategy for discovering relationships between preprints and journal articles and applied it to all the preprints in the Crossref database. We made the resulting dataset, containing both publisher-asserted and automatically discovered relationships, publicly available for anyone to analyse.
Public
Crossref

New preprint analysing coverage of #Crossref #metadata from @LudoWaltman @neesjanvaneck @cwts 🙏

doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/smxe5

"Several initiatives have been taken to promote the open availability of bibliographic metadata of scholarly publications in Crossref. We present an up-to-date overview of the availability of six metadata elements in Crossref..."

"...the analysis also shows that many publishers need to make additional efforts to realize full openness of bibliographic metadata."

Abstract: Several initiatives have been taken to promote the open availability of bibliographic metadata of scholarly publications in Crossref. We present an up-to-date overview of the availability of six metadata elements in Crossref: reference lists, abstracts, ORCIDs, author affiliations, funding information, and license information. Our analysis shows that the availability of these metadata elements has improved over time, at least for journal articles, the most common publication type in Crossref. However, the analysis also shows that many publishers need to make additional efforts to realize full openness of bibliographic metadata.
ExploreLive feeds
About